Confirmed. People Are the Scourge of the Earth…

According to greenies and environmentalists…

Don’t get me wrong. I am all for responsible conservation of the earth. But since when are human beings the moral equivalent of animals? So we have to protect various animal species but we need to “control” the human population.

“We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people,” Dr Fedoroff said, stressing the need for humans to become much better at managing “wild lands”, and in particular water supplies.

Pressed on whether she thought the world population was simply too high, Dr Fedoroff replied: “There are probably already too many people on the planet.”

Dr. Fedoroff is the science & technology advisor to the Sect of State (since 2007-hello? Condoleezza).

There it is. Falls right in line with the Eugenics movement. The same “philosophy” that says some human beings are more valuable than others, allows you to determine a finite number of allowable human beings for the earth. Hitler wasn’t wrong I guess. We need to determine the best line of genes (as you would breeding a dog), nurture it and limit the undesirables.

Next up Quotas on national populations – see China.

Article

Movement to International Bureaucracy, Less US Sovereignty

Excerpts From The Heritage Foundation’s Morning Bell Email:

…Outlines of the deal President Obama and other world leaders will agree to have been noticeable for weeks … and it is not good news for the American people.

…U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner signaled the Obama Administration was more than willing to submit to global financial regulations telling reporters: “Our hope is that we can work with Europe on a global framework, a global infrastructure which has appropriate global oversight.”

This is just about the worst agreement that the summit could possibly have produced. It’s the worst of both worlds: more so-called stimulus spending for everyone, a globalization of Europe’s slow-growth economic model, and a subversion of U.S. sovereignty by a new global super-regulator. Heritage analyst Theodore Bromund explains:

Europe’s call for a global regulator with a mandate to ensure the stability and balance of the world economy would be a tremendous step toward forcing its slow growth model on the rest of the world. … These policies are a return to the concept of one size fits all and to the belief that politicians and unelected bureaucrats on the global level can effectively manage the world’s economy. Europeans should ask why, if this model works so well, it failed to stop the build-up of systemic risk in Europe.

Instead of more deficit spending and increased bureaucratic control G-20 nations should be working to fight rising protectionism worldwide and addressing the common entitlement crises that they all share.

Financial Rescue: Can’t We Just Have the $42,105 for Every Man, Woman & Child Instead?

Since it is nearing the GDP…

Article

Netanyahu to Obama: Act or We will

The new Prime Minister of Israel was sworn in yesterday. The Israelis do not dismiss Imanutjob when he repeatedly calls for wiping Israel off of the map – Netanyahu believes him. Is Pres Obama too arrogant to actually take someone for their word or is it that he just doesn’t care?

“You don’t want a messianic apocalyptic cult controlling atomic bombs,” Netanyahu said of the Iranian regime. “When the wide-eyed believer gets hold of the reins of power and the weapons of mass death, then the entire world should start worrying, and that is what is happening in Iran.”

Article

Harold Koh, State Dept’s Legal Adviser Nominee: U.S. Should Accept International Law

Excerpts from the Article:

President Obama’s nominee to be the State Department’s legal adviser has ignited a fury among conservative critics who say his views are a threat to American democracy — an accusation the White House on Tuesday called “outrageous” and “completely baseless.”

Former Clinton administration official Harold Koh, who has been dean of the Yale Law School since 2004, once wrote that the U.S. was part of an “axis of disobedience” with North Korea and Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.

Koh also has long held that the U.S. should accept international law when deliberating cases at home…(this appointment) will give Koh far-reaching influence over the extent to which international norms affect U.S. law.